The Companies (Directors Duties) Amendment Bill
/In early May, a Select Committee issued its report on the Companies (Directors Duties) Amendment Bill, which proposes amendments to section 131 of the Companies Act 1993.
Read MoreDouble-click to edit...
In early May, a Select Committee issued its report on the Companies (Directors Duties) Amendment Bill, which proposes amendments to section 131 of the Companies Act 1993.
Read MoreThe Fletcher Construction Company Ltd v Chubb & BHSI [2023] NZHC 943
The New Zealand High Court recently looked at whether a third-party liability policy provided any cover to a head contractor for its liability to the principal under an indemnity clause in the construction contract. This decision provides helpful guidance on the applicable legal principles.
Read MoreNiamh Leuthart completed her Bachelor of Laws and Bachelor of Arts (Politics) at the University of Otago in December 2022. She completed the last 6 months of her degree in Ireland at the University College of Dublin. Niamh is soon to be admitted to the New Zealand High Court in 2023.
Prior to joining Fee Langstone in February 2023, Niamh gained broad litigation experience as a Law Clerk at a specialist private client firm. There, Niamh assisted on complex disputes within the Trust and Estates Team and was involved in preparing matters for the Family Court. She looks forward to working on a range of commercial litigation matters with Fee Langstone.
Read MoreJono Raymond recently completed a Bachelor of Laws and Commerce, majoring in Economics from the University of Otago. Jono is originally from Christchurch but has moved up to Auckland to start his professional career with Fee Langstone as a Graduate. Jono will be admitted to the New Zealand High Court in 2023. Outside of the office, Jono loves playing golf and socialising with friends and family.
Read MoreFKP Commercial Developments Pty Ltd v Zurich Australian Insurance Ltd [2022] FCA 862
Head contractors will often assume contractual responsibility for both design and construction of a development. This remains their contractual responsibility, even if they engage consultants or subcontractors to carry out the design on their behalf.
Read MoreCatherwood v Asteron Life Ltd [2022] NZHC 3296
The High Court has recently denied Mr Catherwood’s claim for breach of a life insurance policy for terminal illness. The Court addressed the issue of whether the definition of “terminal illness” and “terminally ill” in the policy intended to take into account the effect of available medical treatment on a person’s life expectancy. The Court held that Asteron Life Limited (Asteron) had not breached the terms of the contract of insurance by denying the terminal illness extension of the life policy, when Mr Catherwood had treatment available to him that meant he was not going to die.
Read MoreThe Ministerial Inquiry report into woody debris (including forestry slash) and sediment in Tairāwhiti/Gisborne and Wairoa has been presented to the Government.
Read MoreAfter concern that financial advisers with extensive experience are leaving the industry, the Australian government has released a draft bill removing tertiary education requirements for them.
Read MoreBeca Carter Hollings & Ferner Limited v Wellington City Council [2022] NZCA 624
The Court of Appeal has recently upheld a High Court decision that the Building Act 10-year longstop does not apply to contribution claims against third parties. Contribution claims are instead governed by s 34 of the Limitation Act 2010. This means that time does not begin to run on contribution claims until settlement or judgment occurs. Insurers of third parties, such as professionals or construction entities, remain potentially ‘on the hook’ for much longer than previously thought.
Read MoreMoorhouse Commercial Park v Vero Insurance [2022] NZHC 3260
The High Court has delivered its judgment in a proceeding brought by the owner of a group of industrial buildings damaged by the Canterbury earthquakes, in a decision that will be welcomed by insurers.
Double-click to edit...
As a result of the recent flooding and Cyclone Gabrielle weather events, Fee Langstone has assembled an experienced flood damage response team ready to assist clients with claims issues as they arise.
First party property claims are a substantial part of our practice. We were extensively involved in claims arising out of the Canterbury, Seddon and Kaikoura earthquakes. We also have significant experience in claims arising out of fire, landslips and other natural disasters.
Our flood response team comprises partners Craig Langstone, Cecily Brick and Virginia Wethey and Special Counsel Andrew Durrant. We are ready to provide our clients with specific claims advice as well as general policy advice and claims/settlement strategy.
Pauline, Hannah and Kaartik give an overview of the New Zealand Insurance sector for Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence.
Read MoreWe are pleased to announce that we celebrated several very well-deserved promotions recently. Andrew Durrant moved into his new role as Special Counsel. Morgan Fee, Frances Jones and Jonathan Lewis have transitioned to Senior Associate roles.
Read MoreChambers Rankings 2023
We are very pleased to announce that Fee Langstone was ranked once again as a Band 1 firm for Insurance in the Chambers Asia Pacific Rankings for 2023. This year marks milestones for the firm as it is our eighth ranked year. This year marks Philippa Fee's ninth year ranked for Insurance and Pauline Davies's tenth year ranked for shipping. Pauline was also a contributor to the Chambers Global Practice Guide for Shipping for 2022.
Get to know Ashleigh Moana-Howard who joined the FL team in July as a Senior Solicitor.
Read MoreJDA Co. Ltd and ors v AIG Insurance New Zealand Limited [2022] NZCA 532
The New Zealand Court of Appeal has just delivered its first-ever judgment on the operation of a marine open cargo policy and, in doing so, affirmed orthodox principles taken from English law.
Read MoreBTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25.
On 5 October 2022, the UK Supreme Court released its long-awaited and self-described “momentous” decision considering the fiduciary duty of directors to act in good faith in the interests of the company. Specifically, this decision is the first time that the UK Supreme Court (or the House of Lords) has confirmed that directors owe a duty to consider or act in the interests of the company’s creditors if the company becomes or is at risk of becoming insolvent. In so doing, the decision has implications for directors in New Zealand.
With demurrage and detention have become particularly hot topics since COVID. This paper discusses some international developments in the area, some ideas for reform and also some steps that freight forwarders can take to protect themselves against clients who don’t want to pay for these costs.
Read MorePartner Craig Langstone was honoured to be awarded a Lifetime Membership at the NZILA Conference held in Queenstown on 29th to 30th September. It is only the fourth Lifetime Membership awarded in the 30 or so years that the New Zealand Insurance Law Association has existed and is in recognition of many years of service to the NZILA.
Read MoreAt Fee Langstone we’re experts in the field of insurance law. We are a team of skilled litigation lawyers, able to work with you to provide strategies and robust solutions, fast.
The Building Amendment Bill proposes a significant change to the way liability for defective building work is allocated in New Zealand. At the centre of the reforms is a move away from joint and several liability towards proportionate liability for building defect claims.
Birchfield v Birchfield [2026] NZCA 477 is an interesting decision commenting on the limits of costs arising from Judicial Settlement Conferences.
The High Court ordered $22,848.67 in wasted costs against a party following an unsuccessful JSC. Essentially, the Judge considered that the party had failed to engage meaningfully in the process by refusing to shift from his pre-JSC position.
A few months ago, the London Engineering Group (LEG) announced that it will be publishing revised LEG clauses later this year to provide greater clarity for the construction insurance market. The announcement follows the 2023 U.S. Federal Court decision in South Capitol Bridgebuilders v Lexington Insurance in which LEG 3 was described as “ambiguous—egregiously so” and “internally inconsistent and bordering incomprehensible”. This does not surprise us. We have encountered similar concerns with LEG 3 in the context of large construction projects in New Zealand. Despite these longstanding issues, the clause remains widely used, making the proposed revisions a welcome development.
We turned up the volume for this year’s Client Function with a night of glam rock! A fantastic night spent with clients and friends of the firm. Thanks to everyone who joined us and helped make it such a great evening.
The Star Entertainment Sydney Properties Pty Ltd v Buildcorp Group Pty Ltd [2026] NSWSC 27
The boundary between defective work and “property damage” is regularly a disputed issue in a construction insurance context. Under a liability policy, the builder’s liability for damage will ordinarily trigger the policy’s insuring clause. However, the policy will usually exclude cover for the builder’s defective work, or perhaps only provide cover to a limited extent.
The District Court has imposed fines totalling $1.104 million on Brand Developers Limited (BDL), trading as TV Shop, following convictions on 13 charges under the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA). The decision is a significant recent penalty judgment and provides useful guidance on how the courts assess culpability for misleading conduct affecting consumers.
The Health and Safety at Work Amendment Bill has been reported back by the Education and Workforce Committee. The Committee has recommended, by majority, that the Bill be passed with amendments.
The Bill is intended to make the health and safety regime clearer and more focused on serious risks. It does this by introducing the concept of “critical risk”, changing some duties for smaller businesses, clarifying officer and landowner responsibilities, strengthening Approved Codes of Practice, and addressing how the Health and Safety at Work Act interacts with other laws.
In Candida Trustee Co Ltd v Teak Construction Group Ltd (in liq) [2026] NZHC 1352, the High Court considered whether a claimant creditor could compel liquidators to disclose a company’s professional indemnity insurance information prior to the claim being resolved.
In contract works claims, a frequent dispute – for both insurers and insureds – is precisely where to draw the line between cover for new “damage” and excluded construction defects. The damage and defects are often interlinked and untangling the issue involves technical evidence.
Auckland
Level 18, 51 Shortland Street
Auckland 1010
Tel. +64 9 373 0050
reception@feelangstone.co.nz
Christchurch
Level 1, 83 Lichfield Street
Christchurch 8011
Tel: +64 3 371 4622