Ministerial Inquiry report into woody debris
/The Ministerial Inquiry report into woody debris (including forestry slash) and sediment in Tairāwhiti/Gisborne and Wairoa has been presented to the Government.
Read MoreThe Ministerial Inquiry report into woody debris (including forestry slash) and sediment in Tairāwhiti/Gisborne and Wairoa has been presented to the Government.
Read MoreAfter concern that financial advisers with extensive experience are leaving the industry, the Australian government has released a draft bill removing tertiary education requirements for them.
Read MoreTe Tari Taiwhenua Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) has issued a formal warning to law firm Kidd Legal under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (AML/CFT Act). This is the first formal warning issued to the legal sector under this legislation.
Ministry of Workplace Relations and Safety, Andrew Little, has ordered WorkSafe to seek external legal advice from Crown Law or Crown Solicitors whenever a Coroner recommends that WorkSafe consider a prosecution or reconsider its decision not to prosecute.
Read MoreCommerce Commission v Lodge Real Estate Limited [2020] NZHC 2329
In our April blog we summarised the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Trade Me/real estate agents price-fixing saga. On dismissal of the real estate agents’ appeal, the Supreme Court referred the matter back to the High Court for determination of the penalty to be paid by Lodge Real Estate and Monarch Real Estate.
Dept of Internal Affairs v OTT Trading Group Ltd [2020] NZHC 1663
In this decision, the Department of Internal Affairs (the Department) claimed that between May 2014 and April 2019, OTT Trading Group (OTT) and MSI Group Limited (MSI) breached their obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (the Act).
Maritime New Zealand v Fullers Group Ltd [2020] NZDC 10157
The lesser known alternative to a traditional fine given under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA) is the use of health and safety project orders.
Read MoreIn yet another instance of a non-financial sanction given under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA), a court-ordered enforceable undertaking pursuant to s156 of the HSWA has been imposed for the first time in New Zealand, instead of a traditional fine.
Read MoreR v Brisbane Auto Recycling Pty Ltd & Ors [2020] QDC 113
In our February 2020 issue of In Brief, we discussed how two further Australian jurisdictions (Victoria and the Northern Territory) had passed workplace manslaughter laws. Now, Australia has had its first workplace manslaughter sentence. The sentence was imposed in Queensland, pursuant to workplace manslaughter laws, which have been in force since 2017 following an amendment to Queensland’s Workplace Health and Safety Act 2011.
Read MoreIn June 2017, a fishing vessel, the Victory II, sank off Kaikōura while grossly overloaded with fish. In a prosecution brought by Maritime New Zealand, Antonio Basile, the sole director of the fishing company, Nino’s Ltd, became the first officer to be convicted and sentenced under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA). Nino’s Ltd was also sentenced, as was the Victory II’s skipper, Mr McCauley.
Read MoreWorkSafe NZ v Salter [2017] NZDC 26277
In 2017, Auckland business owner, Ron Salter, and his waste fuel collection business, Salters Cartage Ltd (Salters), were convicted for a series of breaches of the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992 and the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996. The Police are now commencing proceedings against Mr Salter under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 (Act). This is the first time a proceeding has been brought under this Act in relation to a health and safety offending.
GDC v Aratu Forestry Ltd
This recent sentencing decision is notable for two reasons. First, because of the large fine imposed on a forestry company for breaching the Resource Management Act 1993 (RMA), and second – perhaps more interestingly – because the Court ordered the defendants to pay a significant sum in reparations to affected persons for emotional harm. While reparation payments are common for other kinds of offences, they are uncommon for convictions under the RMA. The case also raises issues such as whether a defendant is insured for reparation payments, and, if so, which insurance policy will provide cover?
Workplace manslaughter (also referred to as industrial/corporate manslaughter) has been an offence in the United Kingdom since 2008. Closer to home, Victoria and the Northern Territory have joined the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) and Queensland as the latest Australian jurisdictions to pass workplace manslaughter laws.
Read MoreAt Fee Langstone we’re experts in the field of insurance law. We are a team of skilled litigation lawyers, able to work with you to provide strategies and robust solutions, fast.
The Health and Safety at Work Amendment Bill has been reported back by the Education and Workforce Committee. The Committee has recommended, by majority, that the Bill be passed with amendments.
The Bill is intended to make the health and safety regime clearer and more focused on serious risks. It does this by introducing the concept of “critical risk”, changing some duties for smaller businesses, clarifying officer and landowner responsibilities, strengthening Approved Codes of Practice, and addressing how the Health and Safety at Work Act interacts with other laws.
In Candida Trustee Co Ltd v Teak Construction Group Ltd (in liq) [2026] NZHC 1352, the High Court considered whether a claimant creditor could compel liquidators to disclose a company’s professional indemnity insurance information prior to the claim being resolved.
In contract works claims, a frequent dispute – for both insurers and insureds – is precisely where to draw the line between cover for new “damage” and excluded construction defects. The damage and defects are often interlinked and untangling the issue involves technical evidence.
For anyone treating the upcoming Contracts of Insurance Act (‘CoIA’) as a box ticking exercise, the FMA’s open letter to insurers last week is a clear warning. The FMA expects insurers to be actively preparing for CoIA now, and has confirmed that implementation will form part of its ongoing monitoring and enforcement activities.
Trustees are personally responsible for expenses and liabilities during their trusteeship. However, it is a fundamental entitlement of every trustee that they have a right to be indemnified from the trust’s assets for those expenses and liabilities, where they have been reasonably incurred. Although personally liable, they are not required to pay out of their own pocket. This right has been recently endorsed and reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, and is enshrined in the Trusts Act 2019.
On 13 May 2026, the Supreme Court granted leave to the RH & JY Trust and its trustees to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision in RH & JY Trust v WorkSafe New Zealand [2026] NZCA 12. The approved question is whether a trust and/or the trustees of a trust acting collectively is a “person” within the meaning of section 16 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA).
Lessons from Ahmed and Others v White & Co (UK) Ltd and Another
The UK Commercial Court’s decision in Ahmed and Others v White & Co (UK) Ltd and Another [2025] EWHC 2399 (Comm) provides a timely and helpful restatement of the principles governing notification of claims and circumstances under claims‑made insurance policies, and the limits of so-called “Hornet’s Nest” style notifications.
A Firm v LCRO & Ors [2026] NZHC 1039 (22 April 2026)
The High Court has overturned a decision of the Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) concerning when a lawyer must cease acting under rule 13.5.2 of the Conduct and Client Care Rules, on the grounds that a member of the lawyer’s firm “is to give evidence of a contentious nature”.
In December 2024, we reported on the District Court decision in Maritime New Zealand v Gibson, which marked the first time a chief executive of a major New Zealand company, namely Ports of Auckland was convicted for failing to comply with officer due diligence duties under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (HSWA). You can find our article, and the facts of the case, here: Maritime New Zealand v Gibson [2024] NZDC 27975 - Insurance law in New Zealand
Auckland
Level 18, 51 Shortland Street
Auckland 1010
Tel. +64 9 373 0050
reception@feelangstone.co.nz
Christchurch
Level 1, 83 Lichfield Street
Christchurch 8011
Tel: +64 3 371 4622