Health & Safety prosecution:  when will a defendant be ‘reckless’?  

Health & Safety prosecution:  when will a defendant be ‘reckless’?  

WorkSafe New Zealand v Waste Management NZ Limited [2021] NZHC 3444

There are few decisions in New Zealand which have looked at what conduct will amount to recklessness in the context of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (the Act). This is why the recent High Court decision, declining WorkSafe’s application for leave to appeal the District Court’s decision, is so important.

Read More

Focus on health and safety: Reparation for emotional harm – what is relevant and who is entitled to it?

Focus on health and safety: Reparation for emotional harm – what is relevant and who is entitled to it?

Ocean Fisheries Limited v Maritime New Zealand [2021] NZHC 2083

The High Court has recently dismissed Ocean Fisheries’ appeal against the amount of reparation for emotional harm imposed by the District Court following the death of three crew members of the Jubilee when it sank in 2015. The Court also allowed Maritime NZ’s cross-appeal against the District Court’s decision not to order emotional harm reparation be paid to a sister of one of the crew members.
The decision extensively considers the nature of the courts’ jurisdiction to order reparation including the quantum of such orders, who is entitled to an order, and the consequences of any voluntary payments.

Read More

$7.5m in penalties for serious anti-money laundering breach

$7.5m in penalties for serious anti-money laundering breach

Dept of Internal Affairs v OTT Trading Group Ltd [2020] NZHC 1663

In this decision, the Department of Internal Affairs (the Department) claimed that between May 2014 and April 2019, OTT Trading Group (OTT) and MSI Group Limited (MSI) breached their obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (the Act).

Read More

First workplace manslaughter in Australia

First workplace manslaughter in Australia

R v Brisbane Auto Recycling Pty Ltd & Ors [2020] QDC 113

In our February 2020 issue of In Brief, we discussed how two further Australian jurisdictions (Victoria and the Northern Territory) had passed workplace manslaughter laws. Now, Australia has had its first workplace manslaughter sentence. The sentence was imposed in Queensland, pursuant to workplace manslaughter laws, which have been in force since 2017 following an amendment to Queensland’s Workplace Health and Safety Act 2011.

Read More

Reparations and the Resource Management Act

Reparations and the Resource Management Act

GDC v Aratu Forestry Ltd

This recent sentencing decision is notable for two reasons. First, because of the large fine imposed on a forestry company for breaching the Resource Management Act 1993 (RMA), and second  – perhaps more interestingly – because the Court ordered the defendants to pay a significant sum in reparations to affected persons for emotional harm.  While reparation payments are common for other kinds of offences, they are uncommon for convictions under the RMA. The case also raises issues such as whether a defendant is insured for reparation payments, and, if so, which insurance policy will provide cover?

Read More

Workplace manslaughter is rolled out further in Australia:  Is New Zealand next?

Workplace manslaughter is rolled out further in Australia:  Is New Zealand next?

Workplace manslaughter (also referred to as industrial/corporate manslaughter) has been an offence in the United Kingdom since 2008. Closer to home, Victoria and the Northern Territory have joined the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) and Queensland as the latest Australian jurisdictions to pass workplace manslaughter laws.

Read More