The end of the Feltex litigation

The end of the Feltex litigation

Houghton v Saunders [2021] NZSC 38

A recent decision by the Supreme Court has brought an end to a long-running saga through the New Zealand courts. Commenced in 2008, a class action suit of some 3,600 shareholders has rolled on against the directors of Feltex Carpets Limited (Feltex) and its (former) private equity owner, Credit Suisse, for thirteen years.

Read More

Contribution claim against third parties for negligence not barred by the 10-year longstop period in the Building Act

Contribution claim against third parties for negligence not barred by the 10-year longstop period in the Building Act

BNZ Branch Properties Limited v Wellington City Council [2021] NZHC 1058

The High Court has recently ruled that a contribution claim by a defendant against third party engineers was not time-barred by the 10-year longstop period in the Building Act 2004.

Read More

Location of insurer imperative to s 9 LRA claim

Location of insurer imperative to s 9 LRA claim

Livingstone v CBL Corporation Ltd (in liq) [2021] NZHC 755

The High Court has recently issued a decision in the CBL litigation which concerned the territorial ‘location’ of a charge under s 9 of the Law Reform Act 1936 (the LRA). In so doing, the Court reinforced the necessity of using the correct procedure for any jurisdictional challenge.

Read More

Terms of contracts prevail over rights of subrogation

Terms of contracts prevail over rights of subrogation

The law has long recognised that where an insurer has indemnified an insured for loss caused by a third party, the insurer can sue the third party in the insured’s name to recover the amount paid. However, two recent UK decisions have discussed the question of when the terms of a contract entered into by the insured might impact on rights of recovery.

Read More

Legal 500 Rankings

Legal 500 Rankings

Fee Langstone was ranked in Tier One for Insurance, being recognised for "depth of experience" and "well-respected" in the area. Partners Philippa Fee, Craig Langstone, Pauline Davies and Cecily Brick were listed as Leading Individuals. Virginia Wethey was also recognised as a Next Generation Partner. Matt Atkinson, Russell Stewart and Angus Wakeman were also named as Key Lawyers. Thank you to all clients who provided testimonials.

Read More

No coverage under all risks marine policy for losses resulting from fraudulent shipment

No coverage under all risks marine policy for losses resulting from fraudulent shipment

Englehart CTP (US) LLC v Lloyd's Syndicate 1221 & Ors [2018] EWHC 900 (Comm)

Englehart, the insured in this UK case, claimed under an “All Risks” cargo insurance policy for loss it sustained in accepting fraudulent bills of lading for a cargo of copper ingots, where that cargo was never in fact shipped.

Read More

Chambers Rankings 2021 & NZ Law Awards

Chambers Rankings 2021 & NZ Law Awards

Chambers Rankings 2021 & NZ Law Awards

We are very pleased to announce two pleasant surprises in time for Christmas. Fee Langstone was ranked in Band 1 for Insurance Law in the Chambers Asia-Pacific Rankings 2021 with Philippa Fee as a ranked individual. Pauline Davies was also named a ranked individual in Band 2 for Shipping.


We are also delighted to have been awarded NZ Law Awards 2020 Insurance Specialist Law Firm of the Year. This year was a virtual event and all winners were asked to submit an acceptance video in lieu of attending. You can watch our rather silly one here.

Read More

New Covid 'test case' out of New South Wales

New Covid 'test case' out of New South Wales

Regular readers will be aware that Fee Langstone has been providing updates on the UK ‘test case’ on the business interruption response to COVID-19 related claims.

Closer to home, the New South Wales Court of Appeal has also recently handed down its decision in its own test case. It found in favour of insured businesses, ruling that insurers could not rely on certain disease exclusion clauses to deny claims for loss caused by business interruption losses from COVID-19.

Read More

Continuing developments in Southern Response v Ross – Class Action “opt-out” approved

Continuing developments in Southern Response v Ross – Class Action “opt-out” approved

Southern Response Earthquake Services Limited v Ross continues to throw up significant legal developments. The latest is the landmark judgment issued last month by the Supreme Court whereby it has approved the use of an “opt-out” representative action regime in New Zealand.

Also, in a significant postscript, the government has announced a “proactive package” to be offered to eligible policyholders. This article looks at both developments.

Read More